SIA “BM Holding” biometāna ražotnē “Mazās Druvas” projekta ietvaros veiks „Biometāna transportēšanas komplekta” iegādi sava saražotā biometāna transportēšanai. Projekta īstenošanas rezultātā sasniedzamais mērķis ir vismaz 16 000 MWh pārvadāta biometāna gadā. Projekta kopējās izmaksas 600 567,00 EUR, t.sk., ALTUM aizdevums 515 430,00 EUR (90% apmērā).

BM-Holding-plaksne-2026

Jauns, rūpnieciski ražots M1 kategorijas transportlīdzeklis (BYD, SEALION 7 EXCELLENCE), kas par vienīgo mehānisko dzinējspēku izmanto enerģiju no transportlīdzeklī glabātās elektroenerģijas, un kura siltumnīcefekta gāzu emisijas ir 0 g CO2/km kategorijas transportlīdzeklis. Kopējā projekta summa 52 038.00 Eur no kura kapitāla atlaides apmērs 5000.00 Eur.10/2025-10/2026.

Three solar power stations with a total inverter capacity of 2.799 MW and solar panel capacity of 3.717 MW (No. PIET-EE2-108).

The average generated energy output of the facilities is 3263.73 MWh per year, with a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of no less than 355.75 tCO2 per year. The portion of generated energy to be used for self-consumption by SIA “BM Holding” within the respective system connection annually shall not be less than 80%.

Let’s explain the principles and benefits of variable rate fertilization. How to determine the first dose of N top-up fertilization for canola? Farming experience, fertilizing rapeseed with a variable dose of N and using “Atfarm”;

How to determine the nitrogen dose for wheat with technologies and various solutions: N-Sensor technology, measurement of the number of productive stems per square meter;

Soil nitrogen control with “Zero field” – practical advice on how to install it;

Recommendations for further fertilizing for winter crops.

Connect: www.agronomubrokastis.lv

Youtube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9R-5H7SPvw&t=1337s

The total value of Latvian companies in 2021, compared to the previous year, has increased by 9.64%, reaching 37.20 billion euros. Data compiled by “Lursoft” shows that the agricultural sector has also undergone changes, with the total value of companies growing to 2.19 billion euros.

There are currently more than 25.7 thousand companies operating in the sector, and their total turnover in 2020 was 2.6 billion euros.

Analyzing the data on the TOP 20 most valuable companies working in the agricultural sector, it can be seen that their total turnover in 2020 exceeded 800 million euros. It is estimated that the total value of the TOP 20 most valuable companies in the agricultural sector has decreased by 8.5% over the last year compared to the previous year – if in 2020 the total value of the TOP 20 most valuable agricultural companies was 1.65 billion euros, then year before – 1, 51 billion euros.In total from the list of the TOP 20 most valuable companies in the agricultural sector, logging is the most widely represented with 6 companies, 3 companies each from the poultry sector, as well as from the sector related to forestry and other forestry activities. The other companies from the list represent various agricultural sectors – cereals, fishing, vegetable growing, etc.

The largest company in the agricultural sector with a significant uprise is still AS “Latvijas valsts meži”, the value of which reaches 911 million euros. Compared to the previous year, the value of the company has decreased by 17% due to the decrease in its turnover and profit. The data available from “Lursoft” shows that the turnover of AS “Latvijas valsts meži” last year, compared to 2019, decreased by 6.78%, but the profit by 40.69%, falling to 349.69 million Euros and 62 million Euros, respectively. , 29 million Euros. In its assessment, “Capitalia” points out that with the rapid increase in timber prices in 2021, it is expected that AS “Latvijas valsts meži” and other timber manufacturers will be able to significantly increase their turnover and profit indicators, and as a result also increase business value. Last year, AS “Latvijas valsts meži” sold 7.52 million cubic meters of wood, including 7.23 million cubic meters of roundwood.

The second most valuable company in the agricultural sector is the lesser-known SIA “Baltreids”, which is engaged in fishing on the coast of Africa. Last year, according to the management report submitted by SIA “Baltreids”, it was engaged in fishing in the fishing areas of Mauritania and Morocco. The company has been able to show high profit rates on a regular basis, but it has been particularly successful in 2020, as a result of which the value of the company’s business has increased significantly – by 40%. The value of SIA “Baltreids”, registered in Liepaja and owned by Oleg Hramov and Nikolay Varushechkin, reached 102.79 million Euros last year. In 2020, the company managed to increase its turnover to 32.17 million Euros and its profit to 13.66 million Euros.

The top three most valuable companies are closed by the Valmiera region grain cooperative “VAKS”, which has been able to double its turnover during the last five years and has rapidly moved up to the list of the most valuable agricultural companies.

Among the most valuable companies in the industry, forestry-related companies are the most widely represented (9 out of 20), while the fastest jump in business value (355% compared to the previous year) was demonstrated by AS “Agrofirma Tērvete”, a newcomer to this top list. “Capitalia” points out that the value of Zemgale agricultural company AS “Agrofirma Tērvete” has increased due to significant non-core income in 2020, so it may be difficult to maintain its high 11th place in the list of the most valuable companies in the industry next year. Lursoft has researched that the turnover of AS Agrofirma Tērvete last year was the lowest in the last eight years, decreasing to 11.52 million Euros, at the same time the company gained 8.83 million Euros in revenue from other economic activities.

Changes in the list of the TOP 20 most valuable agricultural enterprises have been registered in seven positions. SIA “Gaižēni”, SIA “PATA”, SIA “Miķelāni bekons”, also SIA “Jubergs”, SIA “Laskana-mežs” and SIA “Krauzers” have dropped from the list, while SIA “Sabiedrība Mārupe” has given its place to the top related company SIA “Mārupe Greenhouses”with several times higher turnover. “Lursoft” Multi report data shows that SIA “Mārupes Siltumnīcas” in 2020 managed to increase the turnover to 11.33 million Euros, but the profit to 2.37 million Euros, and it is planned to invest in the further development of the company. 2020 was the first in its entire period of operation, when the company’s profit exceeded the mark of 2 million Euros. In the submitted annual report, the company has indicated that in 2020 it grew cucumbers and tomatoes in an area of ​​8.6 ha. Other newcomers to the TOP 20 list of the most valuable agricultural companies – AS “Ziedi JP”, KS “Durbes grauds”, forestry companies SIA “R GRUPA” and SIA “Vecvagari M”, as well as biogas producer SIA “Anaerobic holding”.

The business valuation methodology used is based on the comparable company method, which is one of the generally accepted company valuation methods. The assessment is based on the historical financial results submitted by the company. The calculation of the company’s value considers the historical turnover, turnover growth and profitability indicators of the company and the industry. The valuation model was prepared by “Capitalia” in collaboration with “Lursoft”.

https://www.delfi.lv/bizness/biznesa_vide/lauksaimniecibas-nozares-vertigakie-uznemumi.d?id=54040902

The in-depth cooperation program is a new form of cooperation with taxpayers implemented by the State Revenue Service, where companies that meet the criteria are selected for inclusion and grouping in three levels – Bronze, Silver, Gold. Depending on the level of the program, the State Revenue Service provides various benefits to its participants.

We have just experienced the largest frost in the last two years – it is good that we were able to warm our economy at the same time, because we have entrepreneurs who can produce the necessary heat from local renewable energy sources – greener and cheaper, admits Mārtiņš Pelšs, board member of SIA Agro Iecava & SIA AD Biogāze station.

Our SIA Agro Iecava biogas station is located in Iecava with its 5700 inhabitants. We fully meet the heat energy needs of the municipality for most of the year. We sell the heat produced from biogas cogeneration units to the city of Iecava, which is on average at least 25% cheaper than SIA Iecavas Siltums can produce in its natural gas boilers.

“Currently, the heat energy tariff approved in Iecava is 51.57 EUR / MWh lower than in the neighboring Bauska or Jelgava and is generally one of the lowest in Latvia, however, by making unreasonable changes in the Cabinet of Ministers regulations No. 560, it would become one of the highest.”

An increase in heat tariffs would be just one of the disadvantages of closing our renewable energy sector. This energy shortage in the state balance would be easily and quickly replaced by natural gas – those are 5 million euros, which flows out of the Latvian economy every week. In another of our biogas stations near the Belarusian border – SIA AD Biogas station is just a newly opened factory for the export of firewood. Together, we have invested EUR 1.5 million to meet the requirements introduced last year. The factory employs 30 people at the border, who will lose their job without even working for half a year because of the government changing the rules of the game again. This kind of attitude is seen by both foreign and domestic investors. What confidence can they have that investing in this country they will ever be able to regain something? Where does empty promises disappear to strengthen the economy in regions?

We are a member of the European Union, but in the field of renewable energy, we are definitely rowing in the opposite direction. It is not a big deal that years from now, waves of sanctions because of outstanding requirements will follow from the EU about GHG emission reduction requirements, the share of renewable energy sources, organic waste recycling, etc. If politicians are unable to open their eyes and stop arguing about decisions made in the past, it will not be followed by a flood of water, but what will happen is another wave of human emigration; sewage sludge will again accumulate in piles and slurry will flow into rivers.

We agree that the state has every right to check and monitor that the energy is indeed produced from renewable energy sources and used for its intended purpose, which also receives aid, but it cannot happen that we are accused of overcompensation, over-subsidization, etc. and the producer cannot submitting his actual financial data, but using calculators compiled by a little-known consultant. Consequently, the industry ordered KPMG to independently determine the validity of this calculation. The results of the study were not flattering to the Ministry of Economics – the benchmarks used in the calculations do not correspond to the reality of the industry and artificially inflate the industry’s profit, creating the illusion of overcompensation. The change of attitude in communication from the Ministry of Economics is commended in recent weeks, which gives hope that we will be able to end the heating season.